• Margriet Stavast, Senior Manager |

IPU鈥橲: how to design an EU Hub for banks

乐鱼(Leyu)体育官网

In the previous blog, we wrote about the CRD-requirement for international banks outside the EU聽 (called Third Country Groups or TCG鈥檚) to establish an Intermediate Parent Undertaking (IPU). Or, in a nutshell: the obligation to consolidate TCG entities in the EU to establish the EU Headquarter of the bank. In this blog, we will dive into some important considerations for setting up an IPU in the EU. For example: to branch or not to branch?聽

To branch or not to branch?

乐鱼(Leyu)体育官网

An important consideration is, obviously, in which country the TCG prefers to establish the EU Headquarter or 鈥楨U Hub鈥�. The choice for a specific country has impact on operations, clients, licences, tax, governance but also the culture and history of the bank should be taken into account. The location of the IPU should fit with the strategy and culture of the bank 鈥� and with the people running the bank. Another important topic is the legal form of the IPU. Some banks prefer a branch-driven model with branches in the countries the bank is operating in. Other banks prefer to operate through subsidiaries. We will not go into the details of 鈥榮ubs鈥� but we will describe the pros and cons of branches in this blog.聽

Regimes for regular branches and Third Country Branches (TCB鈥檚)

乐鱼(Leyu)体育官网

There is a difference between 鈥榬egular branches鈥�, that are owned by the EU subsidiary, and Third Country Branches (TCB鈥檚) that are directly owned by the TCG. Regular branches are subject to the supervisor of the home country of the subsidiary. TCB鈥檚 are subject to the home supervisor of the TCG; the local European (host) supervisor of the TCB has limited authorities. There are no direct activities, and as a result a licence is not required for both branches; a notification to the local supervisor is sufficient. To compare: subsidiaries are subject to the local supervisor and are licensed entities.

There are no harmonized rules for TCB鈥檚 in the EU yet. TCB鈥檚 are treated differently across the EU.聽However, it is expected that the European Commission will move towards a set of harmonized rules bringing TCB regimes closer to the one of subsidiaries. EBA has issued a report in 2021 about the treatment of TCB鈥檚 and has identified an increasing trend in the use of TCB鈥檚 by TCG鈥檚 as a form of accessing and operating in the EU market. However, as a consequence of having the lead supervision with the home supervisor of the TCG, the local supervisors lack oversight. In addition, a divergence of national rules may lead to regulatory arbitrage. Therefore, EBA considers harmonisation of national rules on TCB鈥檚 to be necessary in terms of effective cooperation with third country home authorities, the scope of authorisation, prudential requirements (notably capital, liquidity and internal governance), AML/CFT aspects, reporting, booking arrangements and recovery plans.聽CRDVI will include detailed rules for TCB鈥檚. We will discuss CRDVI in one of our next blogs.

So, the question is: to TCB or not to TCB?

乐鱼(Leyu)体育官网

To remind us of the IPU-angle in this story, the following is important. The assets of all the TCG鈥檚 branches (both regular and TCB鈥檚) in the EU are included in the calculation of the total assets for the threshold for an IPU (EUR 40 billion). However, these TCB鈥檚 are not required to move under the umbrella of the IPU! They can remain direct branches of the TCG and continue to be supervised by the home supervisor of the TCG.

However, our experience is that the ECB and national supervisors in the EU prefer fully licensed subsidiaries with regular branches rather than stand-alone TCB鈥檚 or 鈥榥on-licensed activities鈥�. As soon as it is a subsidiary, the regulator requests a different level of transparency and implied responsibility.聽Therefore, our advise would be to include TCB鈥檚 in the IPU as regular branches. The aim of an IPU is to prevent unnecessary complexity of the overall structure. According to the EBA Guidelines on Internal Governance, institutions should avoid setting up complex and potentially non-transparent structures. The more complex and opaque the organizational and operational structure, and the greater the risks, the more intensive the oversight of the structure should be.聽

Connect with us

乐鱼(Leyu)体育官网

Margiet Stavast
Senior manager, Risk & Regulatory
乐鱼(Leyu)体育官网 in the Netherlands

Joost Lensen聽
Director,聽Financial Risk Management
乐鱼(Leyu)体育官网 in the Netherlands聽

Welmoed Rentes
Senior Consultant,聽Financial Risk Management
乐鱼(Leyu)体育官网 in the Netherlands聽

Sarab Zainel
Consultant, Financial Risk Management
乐鱼(Leyu)体育官网 in the Netherlands聽

  • Margriet Stavast

    Margriet Stavast

    Senior Manager, Risk & Regulatory

    Blog articles